Table of Contents
What is the difference between a Fully Anechoic Chamber (FAC) and a Semi-Anechoic Chamber (SAC)?
A semi-anechoic chamber (SAC) and a fully anechoic chamber (FAC) are both specialised facilities used for testing the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and radio frequency (RF) performance of devices. Both types of chambers are designed to eliminate or reduce reflections of electromagnetic waves, which allows for more accurate and reliable testing results.
However, there are some key differences between the two types of chambers:
Level of isolation: A FAC is designed to completely eliminate all external interference and reflections of electromagnetic waves, while a SAC is designed to reduce but not completely eliminate these factors. This means that a FAC provides a higher level of control over the testing environment compared to a SAC.
Frequency range: A FAC is typically able to accommodate a wider frequency range compared to a SAC, which makes it suitable for testing devices that operate at extremely high or low frequencies.
Testing scenarios: A FAC is suitable for testing devices that will be used in controlled environments or that require a high level of accuracy, while a SAC is more suitable for testing devices that will be used in outdoor or semi-outdoor environments.
Cost and space requirements: FACs are typically more expensive to build and operate compared to SACs, and they require a larger amount of space.
Overall, a FAC is a specialised facility that provides a high level of control over the testing environment and is suitable for testing devices that require a completely controlled environment or that operate at extremely high or low frequencies. A SAC is a more cost-effective option that is suitable for testing devices that will be used in outdoor or semi-outdoor environments.
Fully Anechoic Chamber (FAC)
Advantages
Complete isolation from external interference: FACs are designed to completely eliminate all external interference and reflections of electromagnetic waves, which allows for more accurate and reliable testing results. This is particularly important for testing devices that will be used in controlled environments or that require a high level of accuracy.
Wide frequency range: FACs are typically able to accommodate a wide frequency range, which makes them suitable for testing devices that operate at extremely high or low frequencies.
Greater control over the testing environment: FACs provide a higher level of control over the testing environment compared to SACs, which may not completely eliminate all external interference and reflections of electromagnetic waves.
Ability to test devices at higher power levels: FACs can accommodate testing of devices at higher power levels compared to SACs, which may be limited in the amount of power they can handle.
Disadvantages
Cost: FACs are typically more expensive to build and operate compared to semi-anechoic chambers (SACs) or open area test sites (OATS).
Size and space requirements: FACs require a large amount of space and are typically quite large, which may not be practical or feasible for some testing facilities.
Limited testing scenarios: FACs are designed to eliminate all external interference and reflections of electromagnetic waves, which means they are not suitable for testing devices that will be used in outdoor or semi-outdoor environments.
Limited access: FACs are typically located within a shielded room or building, which can make access to the chamber difficult and require special precautions.
Semi Anechoic Chamber (SAC)
Advantages
Realistic testing conditions: SACs provide a more realistic testing environment compared to fully anechoic chambers (FACs), which are artificially designed to completely eliminate reflections of electromagnetic waves. This can lead to more accurate and reliable testing results, particularly for devices that will be used in outdoor or semi-outdoor environments.
Cost-effectiveness: SACs are typically less expensive to build and operate compared to FACs, which require specialised construction and materials.
Flexibility in testing scenarios: SACs can accommodate a variety of testing scenarios and can be used to test devices in both controlled and outdoor environments.
Ability to test multiple devices simultaneously: SACs allow for testing multiple devices simultaneously, which can be useful for evaluating the interference or compatibility between different devices.
Ability to test devices at higher power levels: SACs can accommodate testing of devices at higher power levels compared to FACs, which are typically limited in the amount of power they can handle.
Disadvantages
Limited control over the testing environment: SACs do not provide the same level of control over the testing environment as fully anechoic chambers (FACs), which are designed to eliminate all external interference and reflections of electromagnetic waves.
Limited frequency range: SACs are typically limited in the frequency range that they can accommodate, which may not be suitable for testing devices that operate at extremely high or low frequencies.
Interference from external sources: SACs are vulnerable to interference from external sources such as other RF devices or nearby buildings, which can affect the accuracy of the testing results.
Environmental factors: SACs are subject to environmental factors such as weather, temperature, humidity, and atmospheric conditions, which can affect the accuracy of the testing results.
What is an Open Area Test Site (OATS)?
An Open Area Test Site (OATS) is an open area of ground that has a metal ground plane. They are the most simple and cost-effective way to measure Radiated Emissions (EMI) and are typically situated away from urban radio frequency sources due to the increase in RF emissions.
Advantages
Realistic testing conditions: OATS provide a more realistic testing environment compared to anechoic chambers, which are artificially designed to completely eliminate reflections of electromagnetic waves. This can lead to more accurate and reliable testing results, particularly for devices that will be used in outdoor or semi-outdoor environments.
Larger testing area: OATS typically have a larger testing area than anechoic chambers, which allows for more flexibility in testing larger devices or devices that require a larger distance between the transmitter and receiver.
Ability to test multiple devices simultaneously: OATS allow for testing multiple devices simultaneously, which can be useful for evaluating the interference or compatibility between different devices.
Ability to test devices at higher power levels: OATS can accommodate testing of devices at higher power levels compared to anechoic chambers, which are typically limited in the amount of power they can handle.
Cost-effectiveness: OATS are typically less expensive to build and operate compared to anechoic chambers, which require specialised construction and materials.
Disadvantages
Environmental factors: OATS are subject to environmental factors such as weather, temperature, humidity, and atmospheric conditions, which can affect the accuracy of the testing results.
Interference from external sources: OATS are also vulnerable to interference from external sources such as other RF devices or nearby buildings, which can affect the accuracy of the testing results.
Limited control over the testing environment: OATS do not provide the same level of control over the testing environment as anechoic chambers, which are designed to eliminate all external interference and reflections of electromagnetic waves.
Limited frequency range: OATS are typically limited in the frequency range that they can accommodate, which may not be suitable for testing devices that operate at extremely high or low frequencies.
What are anechoic chambers used for?
EMC testing is an important step in the development and certification of electronic devices, and it helps to ensure that these devices can operate safely and reliably in a variety of environments. EMC testing is often required by regulatory agencies and industry standards, and it may be conducted by specialised testing laboratories or in-house testing facilities. EMC testing may involve the use of specialised test equipment and facilities, and it typically requires trained and experienced personnel to conduct the tests and interpret the results.
Radiated Emissions (EMI)
Measures the amount of EMI that is emitted by a device in the form of electromagnetic radiation. The device is placed in an anechoic chamber or shielded enclosure, and a test instrument is used to measure the emissions at various frequencies and levels of intensity. The emissions are compared to regulatory limits to ensure that they are within acceptable levels.
Radiated Immunity (RI)
Measures the ability of a device to operate properly in the presence of radiated EMI. During this test, the device is placed in an anechoic chamber or shielded enclosure, and it is subjected to simulated electromagnetic radiation at various frequencies and levels of intensity. The device’s performance is evaluated to ensure that it continues to operate properly under these conditions.
Conducted Immunity
Measures the ability of a device to operate properly in the presence of conducted EMI on its power or signal lines. During this test, the device is connected to a test circuit that simulates the conducted EMI, and the device’s performance is evaluated under various levels of interference. The test circuit may simulate different types of conducted EMI, such as common mode or differential mode interference.
Conducted Emissions
Measures the amount of EMI that is conducted from a device onto power or signal lines. The device is connected to a test circuit that measures the conducted emissions, and the emissions are compared to regulatory limits. The test circuit may measure the emissions at different frequencies and levels of intensity.
Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Immunity:
Measures the ability of a device to withstand electrostatic discharge, which is a common cause of EMI. During this test, the device is subjected to simulated ESD events, which may involve the application of high voltage discharges to various parts of the device. The device’s performance is evaluated to ensure that it continues to operate properly under these conditions.
Surge Immunity:
Measures the ability of a device to withstand voltage surges, which can also cause EMI. During this test, the device is subjected to simulated surge events, which may involve the application of high voltage surges to the device’s power or signal lines. The device’s performance is evaluated to ensure that it continues to operate properly under these conditions.
Magnetic Field Immunity:
This test measures the ability of a device to operate properly in the presence of strong magnetic fields. During this test, the device is placed in a magnetic field test chamber and subjected to a simulated magnetic field at various frequencies and levels of intensity. The device’s performance is evaluated to ensure that it continues to operate properly under these conditions.
Magnetic Field Emissions:
Measures the amount of magnetic field radiation that is emitted by a device. A test instrument is used to measure the emissions at various frequencies and levels of intensity, and the emissions are compared to regulatory limits.
Voltage Dips and Interrupts:
Measures the ability of a device to withstand brief, high-voltage transients, which can cause EMI. During this test, the device is subjected to simulated transient events, which may involve the application of high-voltage transients to the device’s power or signal lines.
Transient Immunity:
Measures the amount of power frequency magnetic field radiation that is emitted by a device. The emissions are measured using a test instrument and compared to regulatory limits.
Power Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity:
Measures the ability of a device to operate properly in the presence of strong power frequency magnetic fields. Power frequency magnetic fields are typically generated by electrical power transmission and distribution systems, and they can cause EMI if they are strong enough. During this test, the device is placed in a test chamber and subjected to a simulated power frequency magnetic field at various levels of intensity. The device’s performance is evaluated to ensure that it continues to operate properly under these conditions.
Power Frequency Magnetic Field Emissions:
Measures the amount of power frequency magnetic field radiation that is emitted by a device. Power frequency magnetic field radiation is typically generated by electrical devices that use alternating current (AC) power, and it can cause EMI if it is strong enough. A test instrument is used to measure the emissions at various frequencies and levels of intensity, and the emissions are compared to regulatory limits.
What is Absorber material used inside EMC Chambers?
RF pyramidal absorber is a low-density polyurethane foam specifically designed to reduce radio frequency reflections by transferring electromagnetic waves into heat energy. Depending on the frequency range they vary in size from 60mm to 1520mm in height, MDL offers an ETS-Lingren absorber series that can cover 80Mhz – 40GHz with minimal guaranteed reflectivity.Â
What are ferrite tiles used for?
Anechoic chambers can also be lined with ferrite tiles, these tiles are typically made from sintered ferrite and include a dielectric backing layer. This creates a optimum low and high-frequency return loss performance. They typically cover between the ranges of 30 MHz to 1 GHz and may be accompanied by the pyramidal absorber if the required frequency is above 1GHz.
How big does an Anechoic Chamber need to be?
For RF and microwave testing, an anechoic chamber typically needs to be large enough to accommodate the device under test and the measurement equipment, as well as allow for sufficient space between the device and the chamber walls. The size of the chamber will also depend on the frequency range being tested, as higher frequencies require shorter wavelengths and therefore smaller test distances.
For example, an anechoic chamber used for testing cellular phone antennas at 900 MHz may be smaller than one used for testing radar antennas at 10 GHz. In general, anechoic chambers for RF and microwave testing can range in size from small, portable units to large, custom-built chambers.
What is a GTEM test cell?
Gigahertz Transverse Electromagnetic Mode (GTEM) test cells enable users to perform emissions and radiated immunity tests without the use of an Anechoic chamber, they are able to test small or medium size DUT’s. They are able to perform radiated emissions and radiated immunity tests and are ideal for performing quick and accurate tests through the product life cycle.
What is a quiet zone in anechoic chamber
The quiet zone in an RF microwave anechoic chamber is the area within the chamber where the EMF level is minimised. This area is typically located in the centre of the chamber and is where measurements of RF and microwave devices are taken. The size of the quiet zone depends on the size and shape of the chamber, as well as the frequency range of the electromagnetic waves being absorbed.
How are anechoic chambers tested?
There are several methods used to test RF anechoic chambers, including:
Frequency response measurement: The frequency response of an RF anechoic chamber can be measured using a signal generator and a spectrum analyzer. The signal generator is used to transmit a test signal at different frequencies, and the spectrum analyzer is used to measure the strength of the signal as it is received at different locations within the chamber.
Antenna pattern measurement: The antenna pattern of an RF device can be measured using an RF anechoic chamber. This is typically done using a network analyzer and an antenna positioner, which allows the antenna to be moved to different positions within the chamber.
Isolation measurement: The isolation between two antennas within an RF anechoic chamber can be measured using a network analyzer. This allows for the determination of the amount of interference that may be present between the two antennas.
Absorption coefficient measurement: The absorption coefficient of an RF anechoic chamber can be measured using a network analyzer and a test signal at different frequencies. The absorption coefficient is calculated based on the intensity of the signal at each location within the chamber.
Modal analysis: Modal analysis can also be used to test RF anechoic chambers. This is typically done using a network analyzer and specialised software that analyzes the resulting RF data.
Visual inspection: A visual inspection of the chamber can also be useful in identifying any potential problems or areas that may need attention. This might include checking for any damage to the chamber walls or floor, as well as inspecting the chamber’s absorber panels for any signs of wear or damage.
Test Cells and Enclosures
An RF (Radio Frequency) test cell is a specialised laboratory or testing facility designed to evaluate the performance and characteristics of RF (radio frequency) devices and systems. These cells are used to test a wide range of RF-based products and devices, including cell phones, wireless networking equipment, satellite communications systems, and more.
RF test cells are typically equipped with a range of specialised test equipment and measurement tools, including spectrum analyzers, network analyzers, signal generators, power meters, and other RF test instruments. They are typically designed to operate over a wide range of frequency bands, allowing them to test a wide range of RF devices and systems.
In addition to testing the performance of RF devices and systems, RF test cells can also be used to evaluate their compliance with regulatory standards and guidelines, such as those established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States or the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) in Europe.
Overall, RF test cells are essential facilities for ensuring the quality and performance of RF-based products and devices, and for helping to ensure their compliance with regulatory standards.
